Muhammad Arif Rayhan 1, Mohd Shukri Yob 1*, Mohd Juzaila Abd Latif 2, Ojo Kurdi 3, Fudhail Abdul Munir 4

1 Applied Mechanical Design Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, Malacca, Malaysia

2 Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, Malacca, Malaysia

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak, Malaysia

 

Download Citation: |
Download PDF


ABSTRACT

Pipe saddle supports are designed to cradle pipes, distributing their load evenly across the supporting structure. These supports are typically classified into three types, these are sliding, guide, and stopper support based on their placement and function within the piping system. This study develops and validates a finite element (FE) model of pipe saddle supports to improve the accuracy of stress prediction. A vertical load test was conducted to validate the finite element analysis (FEA), which resulting in 83.3% accuracy. The validated model was then used to investigate the correlation between plate thickness and applied pipe load, covering pipe sizes ranging from 26 to 56 inches. FEA results revealed that sliding supports required the least plate thickness, followed by guide supports, while stopper supports required the thickest plates to maintain a safety factor of 3. To further validate this correlation, an additional experiment was conducted using a model with 4.5 mm thick plates. With the same design and boundary condition configuration, the FEA achieved 94.6% accuracy, confirming the modelling technique's suitability for industrial application.


Keywords: Finite element analysis, Pipe support, Pipe saddle support, Stress analysis, Vertical load test


Share this article with your colleagues

 


REFERENCES

  1. Bhattacharya, A. 2013. Stress analysis of pipe support attachments: a comparison of analytical methods and finite element analysis for circular and non-circular attachments. Proceedings of the ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 55676, V003T03A016.

  2. Birhane, A.H., Hari, Y. 2002. Finite element analysis and design of a horizontal tank on saddle supports. Proceedings of PVP2002 2002 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 46504, 275–281.

  3. Bisbos, C.D., Thomopoulos, K., Tzaferopoulos, M. 1993. Computing the frictional contact loads of horizontal steel pipes, loosely resting on saddles. International Jornal of Pressure Vessel and Piping, 58, 75–85.

  4. de Barros, S., Meniconi, L.C.M., Perrut, V.A., Reuther de Siqueira, C.E. 2018. Oil industry. In Handbook of Adhesion Technology: Second Edition. Springer International Publishing, 2,1533–1555).

  5. Hamid, M.F.A., Yob, M.S., Vishnu, J.S., Izahar, M.M. 2024. Development of large-scale bending and torsional test rig using strong floor anchorage system for structural analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2784, 012021.

  6. Khan, S.M.A. 2008. Initial investigation into optimizing design of a pressure vessel saddle. PVP2008 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, 1–4.

  7. Khan, S.M.A. 2010. Stress distributions in a horizontal pressure vessel and the saddle supports. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 87, 239–244.

  8. Koorey, K. 2000. Determination of the optimal pipe support spans for geothermal pipelines. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, 1361–1364.

  9. Mabuchi, T., Shinohara, M. 2004. Recent design approaches of large bore piping exceeding 100 of ratio D/T. Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers, and Piping Components, 46725, 477.

  10. Maxey, R., Pincince, R. 1998. Surmounting design problems in a complex piping system for groundwater remediation. Environmental Progress, 17, 38–47.

  11. Nugraha, A.Y., Kurdi, O. 2018. Studi Upaya Penghematan Energi Listrik Pada Gedung Asthabrata PT Mekar Armada Jaya. EKSERGI Jurnal Teknik Energi, 14, 25–30.

  12. Nuthanapati, S., Adel, K., Al Maskari, J. 2018. Swift solutions to avert major structural failures. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Piping Supports Construction Standard, D031S069R003 1–9.

  13. Raj, V.Y., Yob, M.S., Ab Latif, M.J., Kurdi, O., Kassim, M. S., Izhar, M.M. 2023. Design and analysis of four-point bending test rig for ladder frame. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 26, 323–329.

  14. Rajkumar, P., Nelluri, V.R. 2019. Design of pipe shoe support for horizontal large bore lines. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, 8, 10514–10524.

  15. Ranjbaran, S., Ghalelar, A.D. 2017. Stress of large diameter piping system shoe support. Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 57946, V03AT03A051.

  16. Thomopoulos, K., Bisbos, C.D. 1992. Unilateral contact stresses at steel pipe saddles. Thin-Walled Structures, 15, 305–319.


ARTICLE INFORMATION

Received: 2025-07-31
Revised: 2025-09-22
Accepted: 2025-11-03
Available Online: 2025-12-12


Cite this article:

Muhammad, A.R., Mohd Shukri, Y., Mohd Juzaila, A.L., Ojo, K., Fudhail, A.M., 2025. Correlation study between plate thickness and loading of pipe saddle support. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 23, 2025188. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202603_23(1).003

  Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Other people also read ...