International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering
Published by Chaoyang University of Technology

Shu Fen Chenga,*, Chin Yuan Huangb, Yao Tin Tuc, and Jia Rong Chena

a Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan, R. O. C.
b Department of Bioinformatics, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan, R. O. C.
c Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R. O. C.


 

Download Citation: |
Download PDF


ABSTRACT


Under natural environmental conditions, chromium is often present in trivalent Cr(III) or hexavalent Cr(VI) states. Cr(III) and Cr(VI) have different mobility and toxicity. Furthermore, trivalent chromium is present in cationic state, e.g. CrCl3 and Cr(NO3)3, and hexavalent chromium as oxyanions, e.g. K2Cr2O7 and K2CrO4. This study was to compare the adsorption and distribution of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in contaminated soils and the influence of citric acid and pH on soil washing efficiency. CrCl3 and K2Cr2O7 were the selected as the representative cationic (Cr+3) and anionic (Cr2O7-2) species for study. Two synthetic Cr-contaminated soils were prepared by immersing the soil column in the Cr solutions and the Cr bonding fractions in soils was studied. Furthermore, citric acid solutions with various pH values were used to wash the contaminated soils. The washing efficiency of various chromium bonding fractions as affected by pH and washing time was studied. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the distribution of Cr bonding fraction between the cationic Cr+3 and anionic Cr2O7-2 treated soils. For Cr+3 and Cr2O7-2 contaminated soils, the Fe-Mn oxide bonding fraction was the most dominant, followed by the organic bonding fraction. For the CrCl3 contaminated soils, when the washing time was adequate (48 h), citric acid with lower pH had the highest Cr removal efficiency. For the K2Cr2O7 contaminated soil, the citric acid with pH 6 had the best removal efficiency.


Keywords: Cr(III); Cr(VI); bonding fraction; soil washing.


Share this article with your colleagues

 


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Narin, I., Surme, Y., Soylak, M., and Dogan, M. 2006. Speciation of Cr(III)and Cr(VI) in environmental samples by solid phase extraction on Ambersorb 563 resin. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B136: 579-584.

  2. [2] Banks, M. K., Schwab, A. P., and Henderson, C. 2006. Leaching and reduction of chromium in soil as affected by soil organic content and plants. Chemosphere, 62: 255-264.

  3. [3] Narin, I., Kars, A., and Soylak, M. 2008. A novel solid phase extraction procedure on Amberlite XAD-1180 for speciation of Cr(III), Cr(VI) and total chromium in environmental and pharmaceutical samples. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150: 453-458.

  4. [4] Puzon, G. J., Tokala, R. K., Zhang, H., Yonge, D., Peyton, B. M., and Xun, L. 2008. Mobility and recalcitrance of organo-chromium ((III) complexes. Chemosphere, 70: 2054-2059.

  5. [5] Uluozlu, O. D., Tuzen, M., Mendil, D., Kahveci, B., and Soylak, M. 2009. 3-Ethyl-4-(p-chlorobenzylidenamino-4,5-dihydro1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-one(EPHBAT) as preci -pitant for carrier element free coprecipitation and speciation of chromium(III) and chromium(VI). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172: 395-399.

  6. [6] Isoyama, M. and Wada, S. I. 2006. Soil Chemistry Effect on Feasibility of Cr-decontamination by Acid-Washing. J. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ., 51: 33-36.

  7. [7] Evanko, C. R. and Dzombak, D. A. 1997. Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater. Technology Evaluation Report, TE-97-01, Ground-water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, USA.

  8. [8] Laborda, F., Gorriz, M. P., Bolea, E., and Castillo, J. R. 2007. Mobilization and speciation of chromium in compact: a methodological approach. Science of The Total Environment, 373: 383-390.

  9. [9] Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., and Richer-Lafleche, M. 2008. Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152: 1-31.

  10. [10] Kuo, S., Lai, M. S., and Lin, C. W. 2006. Influence of solution acidity and CaCl2 concentration on the removal of heavy metals from metal-contaminated rice soils. Environmental Pollution, 144: 918-925.

  11. [11] Abumaizar, R. J. and Smith, E. H. 1999. Heavy metal contaminants removal by soil washing. Journal of Hazardous Material, B70: 71-86.

  12. [12] Neale, C. N., Bricka, R. M., and Chao, A. C. 1997. Evaluating acid and chelating agents for removing heavy metals from contaminated soils. Environmental Progress, 16: 274-280.

  13. [13] Jean, L., Bordas, F., and Bollinger, J. C. 2007. Chromium and nickel mobilization from a contaminated soil using chelants. Environmental Pollution, 147: 729-736.

  14. [14] Kantar, C. and Honeyman, B. D. 2006. Citric acid enhanced remediation of soils contaminated with uranium by soil flushing and soil washing. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132: 247-255.

  15. [15] Lenhart, J. J., Cabaniss, S. E., MacCarthy, P., and Honeyman, B. D. 2000. Uranium (VI) complexation with citric, humic and fulvic acids. Acta, 86: 345-353.

  16. [16] Peters, R. W. 1999. Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Material, 66: 151-210.

  17. [17] Logus, B. A., Smith, R. W., and Westall, J. C. 2004. Role of surface alteration in determining the mobility of U(VI) in the presence of citrate: implications for extraction of U(VI) from soils. Sci. Technol., 38: 3752-3759.

  18. [18] Mason, C. F. V., Turney, W. R. J. R., Thomson, B. M., Lu, N., Longmire, P. A., and Chisholm-Brause, C. J. 1997. Carbonate leaching of uranium from contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 2707-2711.

  19. [19] Francis, C. W., Timpson, M. E., and Wilson, J. H. 1999. Bench-and pilot-scale studies relating to the removal of uranium from uranium-contaminated soils using carbonate and citrate lixiviants. Journal of Hazardous Material, 66: 67-87.

  20. [20] Li, F. Y. and Cheng, S. X. 2007. “Laboratory Manual for Soil Analysis”. New Wun Ching Developmental Publishing, Taiwan.

  21. [21] Tessier, A., Campbell P. G. C., and Bisson, M. 1979. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51: 844-850.

  22. [22] Nyamangara, J. 1998. Use of sequential extraction to evaluate zinc and copper in a soil amended with sewage sludge and inorganic metal salts. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 69: 135-141.

  23. [23] Tokalioglu, S., Kartal, S., and Elci, L. 2000. Determination of heavy metals and their speciation in lake sediments by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after a four-stage sequential extraction procedure. Analytica Chimica Acta, 413: 33-40.

  24. [24] Mossop, K. F. and Davidson, C. M. 2003. Comparison of original and modified BCR sequential extraction procedures for the fractionation of copper, iron, lead, manganese and zinc in soil and sediments. Analytica Chimica Acta, 478: 111-118.

  25. [25] Koleli, N. 2004. Speciation of chromium in 12 agricultural soils from Turkey. Chemosphere, 57: 1473-1478.

  26. [26] Weng, H. P. 2004. Leaching treatment of metal contaminated farm soil and investigation the characteristic change of the soil. Ms.D. diss., National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan.

  27. [27] Fu, W. C. 2006. A study of the distribution and the transformation of metal speciation in contaminated agro-environment exemplified by Cr, Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, and Cd. Ms.D. diss., National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan.

  28. [28] Eary, L. E. and Rai, D. 1988. Chromate removal from aqueous wastes by reduction with ferrous ion. Sci. Technol., 22: 972-977.

  29. [29] Manceau, A., Schlegel, M. L., Musso, M., Sole, V. A., Gauthier, C., Pettt, P. E., and Trolard, F. 2000. Crystal chemistry of trace elements in natural and synthetic goethite. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 64: 3643-3661.

  30. [30] James, B. R., Petura, J. C., and Vitale, R. J. 1995. Mussoline GR. Hexavalent chromium extraction from soils: a comparison of five methods. Environ. Sci. Technol., 29: 2377-2381.


ARTICLE INFORMATION


Received: 2012-06-20
Revised: 2012-09-11
Accepted: 2012-10-21
Publication Date: 2012-12-01


Cite this article:

Cheng, S.F., Huang, C.Y., Tu, Y.T., Chen, J.R. 2012. Cr-removal efficiency as affected by the Cr-bonding fractionation in soil treated with trivalent and hexavalent chromium. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 10, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.2012.10(4).319


We use cookies on this website to improve your user experience. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.