International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering
Published by Chaoyang University of Technology

Rami A. Hawileh, Haitham A. Badrawi, Hisham Y. Makahleh, Abdul Saboor Karzad*, Jamal A. Abdalla

Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, P.O.BOX 26666, Sharjah, UAE


 

Download Citation: |
Download PDF


ABSTRACT


 The aim of this paper is to examine the effects of using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) as a complete replacement to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams. The proposed GGBFS mix had an air content of 1.4%, a unit weight of 2480 kg/m3, a slump of 201 mm, and a compressive strength of 30 MPa after 56 days of curing. In addition, the GGBFS-based sample have shown an increased durability as it passed less chloride ions when compared to conventional concrete. A total of four beams were cast using the proposed mix and then tested under three-point loading and four-point loading. The beams were categorized into group 1, samples designed to fail in flexure, and group 2, samples designed to fail in shear. The performances of the GGBFS-based specimens were evaluated and compared to the control beams. In flexure, the GGBFS-based sample carried 83% of the control sample’s ultimate load which is considerably less than the expected 96%. Whereas the GGBFS-based shear deficient sample carried 79% of the load carried by the control beam. Although GGBFS samples carried less load, it is concluded that use of GGBFS as a full replacement to OPC is practical as the normalized capacity of GGBFS samples is comparable to that of the control samples. Additionally, using GGBFS contributes to the reduction of CO2 emissions and hence promotes the use of sustainable and green concrete.


Keywords: Compressive strength, Flexure, Shear, Concrete, Geopolymer concrete, GGBFS.


Share this article with your colleagues

 


REFERENCES


  1. ACI Committee 318, 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills (MI)

  2. Allahverdi, A. Maleki, A., Mahinroosta, M. 2018. Enhancement of hydraulic activity of slag-blended portland cement. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19, 1009–1020.

  3. Andrew, R. 2018. Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2017. Earth System Science Data, 10, 2213–2239.

  4. Babu, K, Kumar, R. 2000. Efficiency of ggbs in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 1031–1036.

  5. Cheng, A., Huang, R., Wu, J., Chen, C. 2005. Influence of ggbs on durability and corrosion behavior of reinforced concrete. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 93, 404–411.

  6. Crossin, E. 2015. The greenhouse gas implications of using ground granulated blast furnace slag as a cement substitute. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 101–108.

  7. Eguchi, K., Takewaka, K., Yamaguchi, T., Ueda, N. 2013. A Study on durability of blast furnace slag cement concrete mixed with metakaolin-based artificial pozzolan in actual marine environment. Proceeding of Third International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies.

  8. Garcia-Lodeiro, I., Palomo, A., Fernández-Jiménez, A. 2015. Crucial insights on the mix design of alkali-activated cement-based binders. handbook of alkali-activated cements, Mortars and Concretes, 49–73.

  9. Grist, R., Paine, K., Heath, A., Norman, J., Pinder, H. 2015. The environmental credentials of hydraulic lime-pozzolan concretes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 26–37.

  10. Hamada, M., Thomas, B., Yahaya, F., Muthusamy, K., Yang, J., Abdalla, J., Hawileh, R. 2021. Sustainable use of palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary cementitious material: a comprehensive review. Journal of Building Engineering, 40, 102286.

  11. Hawileh, R., Abdalla, J., Fardmanesh, F., Shahsana, P. 2017. Performance of reinforced concrete beams cast with different percentages of GGBS replacement to cement. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 17, 511–519.

  12. Huntzinger, D., Eatmon, T. 2009. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 668–675.

  13. Jeong, Y. Yum, W., Jeon, D., Oh, J. 2017. Strength development and microstructural characteristics of barium hydroxide-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cement and Concrete Composites, 79, 34–44.

  14. Joanna, P., Sangeetha, S. 2015. Flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with partial replacement of GGBS. American Journal of Engineering Research, 3, 119–127.

  15. Junaid, M.T., Karzad, A.S., Leblouba, M. 2020. Investigation on the properties of ambient cured alkali activated binder concrete. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 18, 2020339.

  16. Karikalan, A., Prabaghar, A., Saravanan, J. 2021. Flexural behaviour of GGBS concrete beam with steel, hybrid FRP and GFRP bars. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12, 5719–5729.

  17. Kyong Yon, Y., Kyum, K. 2005. An experimental study on corrosion resistance of concrete with ground granulate blast-furnace slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1391–1399.

  18. Ma, C., Awang, A., Omar, W. 2018. Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 90–102.

  19. Mustafa, S., Hassan, H. 2018. Behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid steel and FRP composites. HBRC Journal, 14, 300–308.

  20. Nagaratnam, H., Rahman, M., Mirasa, A., Abdul Manan, M., Lame, S. 2016. Workability and heat of hydration of self-compacting concrete incorporating agro-industrial waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 882–894.

  21. Nawaz, W. Abdalla, J., Hawileh, R., Alajmani, H. 2019. Experimental study on the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams cast with lava lightweight aggregates. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19, 981–996.

  22. O’Connell, M., Mcnally, C., Richardson, M. 2012. Performance of concrete incorporating ggbs in aggressive wastewater environments. Construction and Building Materials, 27, 368–374.

  23. Oner, A., Akyuz, S. 2007. An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29, 505–514.

  24. Ramakrishnan, K., Pugazhmani, G., Sripragadeesh, R., Muthu, D. 2017. Experimental study on the mechanical and durability properties of concrete with waste glass powder and ground granulated blast furnace slag as supplementary cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 739–749.

  25. Samad, S., Shah, A. Limbachiya, M. 2017. Strength development characteristics of concrete produced with blended cement using ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) under various curing conditions. Sādhanā, 42, 1203–1213.

  26. Saranya, P., Nagarajan, P., Shashikala, A. 2018. Eco-friendly GGBS concrete: a state-of-the-art review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 330, 012057.

  27. Siddique, R., Bennacer, R. 2012. Use of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in cement paste and mortar. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 69, 29–34.

  28. Siddique, R., Bennacer, R. 2013. Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: strength and durability properties. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 16, 460–467.

  29. Thomas, B., Yang, J., Mo, K., Abdalla, J. 2021. Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive review. Journal of Building Engineering, 40, 102332.

  30. Topçu, I., Boğa, A. 2010. Effect of ground granulate blast-furnace slag on corrosion performance of steel embedded in concrete. Materials & Design, 31, 3358–3365.

  31. Turner, L., Collins, F. 2013. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 43, 125–130.

  32. Wan, H., Shui, Z., Lin, Z. 2004. Analysis of geometric characteristics of GGBS particles and their influences on cement properties. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 133–137.

  33. Wu, Y., Huang, R., Tsai, C., Lin, W. 2015. Recycling of sustainable co-firing fly ashes as an alkali activator for ggbs in blended cements. Materials, 8, 784-798.

  34. Yuksel, I., 2018. Blast-furnace slag. Waste and Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete, 361–415.


ARTICLE INFORMATION


Received: 2022-02-12
Revised: 2022-05-27
Accepted: 2022-05-30
Available Online: 2022-06-14


Cite this article:

Hawileh, R.A., Badrawi, H.A., Makahleh, H.Y., Karzad, A.S., Abdalla, J.A., Behavior of reinforced concrete beams cast with a proposed geopolymer concrete (GPC) mix. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 19, 2022017. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202206_19(2).009

  Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


We use cookies on this website to improve your user experience. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.