International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering
Published by Chaoyang University of Technology

Tsaqif Al Farrel Ghazali 1*, Mohd Shukri Yob 1*, Mohd Juzaila Abd Latif 2, Ojo Kurdi 3, Fudhail Abdul Munir 4

1 Applied Mechanical Design Laboratory, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, 76100, Malaysia

2 Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, 76100, Malaysia

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia

4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Perak, 32610, Malaysia

 

Download Citation: |
Download PDF


ABSTRACT

Pipe supports play a critical role in ensuring the safe operation of piping systems in industrial environments. When additional piping is introduced, these supports must be reinforced to accommodate increased loads. This study investigates the influence of stiffener parameters, there are beam size, stiffener distance, and stiffener thickness on the load capacity of pipe supports using both experimental testing and finite element analysis (FEA). A stiffened pipe support model was developed and subjected to concentrated load testing, and the corresponding FEA model was validated against the experimental results, achieving an average accuracy of 94.62%. The findings indicate that beam size significantly affects load capacity, while stiffener distance has a more pronounced effect in medium to large beams. In contrast, variations in stiffener thickness showed minimal impact. These results provide valuable insights for engineers aiming to optimize pipe support configurations and establish a foundation for design optimization in manufacturing applications.


Keywords: Load capacity, Stiffener, Pipe support, Finite element analysis.


Share this article with your colleagues

 


REFERENCES

  1.  Ahmad, M., Ismail, K.A., Mat, F. 2013. Convergence of finite element model for crushing of a conical thin-walled tube. Procedia Engineering, 53, 586–593.

  2. Alinia, M.M. 2005. A study into optimization of stiffeners in plates subjected to shear loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 43, 845–860.

  3. Alshoaibi, A.M. 2015. An adaptive finite element framework for fatigue crack propagation under constant amplitude loading. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 13, 261–270.

  4. Azman, A.N.N., Venkatason, K., Sivaguru, S. 2025. Mesh convergence analysis on the aerodynamic performance of a sedan vehicle. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics, 7, 85–95.

  5. Basiński, W. 2019. Design of transverse stiffeners in plate girders with corrugated web. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 63, 577–592.

  6. Bougoffa, S., Durif, S., Mezghanni, O., Bouchaïr, A., Daoud, A. 2023. Analysis of beam web panels with full length transverse stiffener in Compression. Engineering Structures, 297, 116996.

  7. Chacón, R., Mirambell, E., Real, E. 2013. Transversally stiffened plate girders subjected to patch loading. Part 1. Preliminary Study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 80, 483–491.

  8. Chen, C.-H., Ou, C.-I. 2009. Modal identification from field test and FEM updating of a long span cable-stayed bridge. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 6, 251-262.

  9. Choi, B.H., Kang, Y.J., Yoo, C.H. 2007. Stiffness requirements for transverse stiffeners of compression panels. Engineering Structures, 29, 2087–2096.

  10. Drake, R.M., Walter, R.J. 2010. Design of structural steel pipe racks. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 47, 241–252.

  11. EN 1990. 2002. Eurocode - Basis of structural design.

  12. Gavare, P.R., Patil, S.N. 2018. Parametric study of plate girder using different stiffener arrangement. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Engineering, 7, 1161–1174.

  13. Gupta, H., Sathe, R.S., Sharma, J.K. 2022. Numerical analysis on load-settlement response of reinforced granular blanket over ordinary stone column. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 19, 2022057.

  14. Huang, Z., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, T., Xia, Q. 2024. Buckling optimization of curved grid stiffeners through the Level Set Based Density Method. CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 140, 711–733.

  15. Kawade, M. G., Navale, A.V. 2019. Optimization of pipe rack by study of braced bay. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 2, 451–455.

  16. Kurepatil, R.Y., Patil, S.K., Pujari, A.B. 2024. Study of pipe rack design under different support conditions. International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 12, 137–140.

  17. Kuznetsov, D.N., Ponyavina, N.A. 2020. Numerical study of the influence of the distance between stiffeners on the loss of stability of the web of an i-section steel beam. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 753, 042041.

  18. Lee, J.-S., Shin, K.-J., Woo, J.-H. 2024. Experimental and analytical study on non-damaged reinforcement method for pipe rack steel structures. Buildings, 14, 2637.

  19. Maiorana, E., Pellegrino, C., Modena, C. 2011. Influence of longitudinal stiffeners on elastic stability of girder webs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, 51–64.

  20. Meshram, P.D., Prasad, R.K. 2021. Design of optimum pipe rack for various bays. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 3, 1935–1944.

  21. Nagdeote, R.D., Suryawanshi, S.R., Khadake, N. 2021. A review on optimization in design and construction of pipe supports, pipe frames and T posts. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8, 722.

  22. Nerenst, T.B., Ebro, M., Nielsen, M., Eifler, T., Nielsen, K.L. 2021. Exploring Barriers for The Use of FEA-Based Variation Simulation in Industrial Development Practice. Design Science, 7, Article e21.

  23. Papazafeiropoulos, G., Vu, Q.-V., Nguyen, V.-S., Truong, V.-H. 2022. Optimum location of a single longitudinal stiffener with various cross-section shapes of steel plate girders under bending loading. Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - HUCE, 16, 65–75.

  24. Patil, H., Jeyakarthikeyan, P.V. 2018. Mesh Convergence Study and Estimation of Discretization Error of Hub in Clutch Disc with Integration of ANSYS. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 402, 012065.

  25. Peng, Y., Kong, Z., Dinh, B.H., Nguyen, H.H., Cao, T.S., Papazafeiropoulos, G., Vu, Q.V. 2023. Web Bend-Buckling of Steel Plate Girders Reinforced by Two Longitudinal Stiffeners with Various Cross-Section Shapes. Metals, 13, 323.

  26. Plevris, V., Markeset, G. 2018. Educational challenges in computer-based finite element analysis and design of structures. Journal of Computer Science, 14, 1351–1362.

  27. Poutanen, T., Länsivaara, T., Pursiainen, S., Mäkinen, J., Asp, O. 2021. Calculation of safety factors of the eurocodes. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11, 1–9.

  28. Shah, S.M.I., Ganesh, G.M. 2022. Impact of diameter to thickness (D/t) on axial capacity of circular CFST columns: Experimental, parametric and numerical analysis. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 19, 2021486.

  29. Sholikhah, M., Ridwan, R., Prabowo, A.R., Ghanbari-Ghazijahani, T., Yaningsih, I., Muhayat, N., Tjahjana, D.D.D.P., Adiputra, R., Sohn, J.M. 2024. strength assessment of stiffened-panel structures against buckling loads: FE benchmarking and analysis. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 10, 1034–1050.

  30. Sinur, F., Beg, D. 2012. Intermediate transverse stiffeners in plate girders. Steel Construction, 5, 23–32.

  31. Tsavdaridis, K.D., Galiatsatos, G. 2015. Assessment of cellular beams with transverse stiffeners and closely spaced web openings. Thin-Walled Structures, 94, 636–650.

  32. Wang, S., Zhang, H. 2023. A New Design Method for Stiffened Plate Based on Topology Optimization with Min-Max Length-Scale Control. Frontiers in Materials, 10, 1277421.

  33. Yussof, M.M., Silalahi, J.H., Kamarudin, M.K., Chen, P.S., Parke, G.A.R. 2020. Numerical Evaluation of Dynamic Responses of Steel Frame Structures with Different Types of Haunch Connection under Blast Load. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10, 1815.

  34. Zhang, G., Hu, Y., Yan, B., Tong, M., Wang, F. 2024. Buckling and Post-Buckling Analysis of Composite Stiffened Panels: A Ten-Year Review (2014–2023). Thin-Walled Structures, 205, 112525.


ARTICLE INFORMATION

Received: 2025-07-28
Revised: 2025-10-11
Accepted: 2025-12-10
Available Online: 2026-01-14


Cite this article:

Tsaqif, A.F.G., Mohd, S.Y., Mohd, J.A.L., Ojo, K., Fudhail, A.M., 2026. Correlation between stiffener configurations and load capacity for pipe support beam. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 23, 2025185. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202603_23(1).005

  Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Other people also read ...

doaj logo

 

2.9
2023CiteScore
 
 
67th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
 
 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

IJASE - Most Read Articles

IJASE - Most popular articles