International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering
Published by Chaoyang University of Technology

Chyi-Gang Kuo, Lin-Chiang Lee*

Department of Architecture, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan


 

Download Citation: |
Download PDF


ABSTRACT


Cities are complex and dynamic environments that are constantly facing a range of issues with both historical and spatial dimensions. While there are several international design criteria for regenerative design and promoting community well-being, such as the Living Community Challenge (LCC), Living Building Challenge (LBC), and Placemaking (Power of 10+), there are no localized referable design criteria in Taiwan. Therefore, this research aims to explore and propose a new design-factor framework for sustainable community-based public building design through various reviews and suggestions from design experts based on national and international design criteria. It has three levels of factors based on the needs of the community, which are "Surviving and Living", "Happiness and Well-being", and "Mission and Pride", corresponding to 22 design elements and their measure indicators, which help develop a sustainable community in each of the developing stages. By adopting appropriate factors within the developed framework through public investigation, inspiration, and imagination, either government policies or community proposals could improve designs. This will enable private groups or governments to adopt environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices easily in open spaces, public buildings, and surrounding communities.


Keywords: Adaptive renovation, Bioclimatic architecture, Design factor framework, Eco-neighbourhood, Sustainable community


Share this article with your colleagues

 


REFERENCES


  1. Chen, C.H. 2013. "Earth Bound—2013 Student competition- Chiayi House." Taiwan Architect, July. A2-5. Retrieved from https://www.twarchitect.org.tw/2013.07/A2-5.htm.

  2. Ding, Z., Fan, Z., Tam, V.W.Y., Bian, Y., Li, S., Illankoon, I.M.C.S., Moon, S. 2018. Green building evaluation system implementation. Building and Environment, 133, 32–40.

  3. He, Y., Kvan, T., Liu, M., Li, B. 2018. How green building rating systems affect designing green. Building and Environment, 133, 19–31.

  4. International living future institute 2019. Living building challenge 4.0. International Living Future Institute. Seattle, U.S.A. Retrieved from https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/LBC-4_0_v14_2_compressed.pdf

  5. International living future institute 2022. Living community challenge 1.2. International Living Future Institute. Seattle, U.S.A. Retrieved from https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Living-Community-Challenge-1-2.pdf

  6. Jian, N. 2023. "What is community engagement? Definition, principal, example, model, framework, strategies and best practices." IDEASCALE. Retrieved from https://ideascale.com/blog/what-is-community-engagement/

  7. Mavrodieva, A.V., Daramita, R.I.F., Arsono, A.Y., Yawen, L., Shaw, R. 2019. Role of civil society in sustainable urban renewal (Machizukuri) after the Kobe Earthquake. Sustainability, 11(2), 335.

  8. Project for public spaces 2007. "What is placemaking?" Project for Public Spaces. Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking

  9. Project for public spaces 2009. "The power of 10+" project for public spaces. Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/the-power-of-10

  10. Ramli, N.A., Ujang, N. 2020. Adaptation of social attributes of place in creative placemaking towards social sustainability. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 5(18), 1–18.

  11. Ridder, H., Vrijhoef, R. 2008. Developing a strategy for Living Buildings: Beyond cradle to cradle with living building concept. Cardiff, UK.

  12. Satoh, S. 2021. Japanese Machizukuri and community engagement: History, method and practice. First issued in paperback. Routledge. London, UK. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Shigeru-Satoh/dp/1032238895?language=en_US

  13. Schwab, K. 2013. The future role of civil society. World Economic Forum.

  14. Ünal, B., Topçu, K. 2022. Exploring lost spaces towards regaining them for urban life: The case of Konya historical city center. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 3(3), 348–75.

  15. Vierra, S. 2023. "Green building standards and certification systems." Whole building design guide. Retrieved from https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems

  16. Zekos, E. 2012. "Living building challenge." Newsletter of the Western Massachusetts, October, 1.


ARTICLE INFORMATION


Received: 2024-03-02
Revised: 2024-07-15
Accepted: 2024-07-29
Available Online: 2024-12-30


Cite this article:

Kuo, C.G., Lee, L.C. 2024. Research of the design-factor framework for sustainable community-based public building in Taiwan. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 21, 2024066. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202412_21(5).002

  Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.